|
Power Master
Simply powerful designs |
|
|
How to get the most from your RC car electrics & How much more can you get? How do you make your system work better? How to test the rest of the system How to test your battery packs What does this all mean for you??
Car Performance Calculator "Car Performance.xls"
This is not a discussion of how to improve your car motor, but rather how to improve and test every other piece of the electric system in your car. This discussion will show just how much can be gained from improvements to any or all of you electrical drive system. For you to understand what is being discussed here, I am going to include some very basic theory in the most simplest of terms. Also, if your going to test your system, you will need to know how to use a multi-meter. Disclaimer. I will not take responsibility for any damage to any of your testing equipment, of any part of your rc system. You do these tests and modifications at your own risk. Now that I've stated that, the risks are minimal, as long as you don't go shorting across terminals with your meter.
The most basic of electrical laws is "Ohm's Law", which states that :- The current flowing through any resistance is equal to the Applied Voltage divided by the resistance to the flow.
Current (A) (Amps) = Voltage (V) (Volts) Resistance (R) (Ohms)
or A = V R
derived from this is :- V = A x R , and R = V A
The concept of voltage, current and resistance can be likened to water flow. If you have a tank on a hill connected to a pipe with a restriction on the end like a tap, then the further up the hill the tank is, the more pressure you will have. The Pressure = the Voltage. The tap (the restriction) is the resistance to current flow, and the flow of water is the current. Obviously, the greater the pressure, and the less the restriction, the more water is going to flow, as the formula suggests.
The power dissipated (lost) in a resistor is :-
Power (P) (Watts) = Voltage (V) (Volts) x Current (A) (Amps)
or P = V x A watts.
If we substitute the previous equations for V and A, we get :-
P = V2 watts & P = A2 x R watts R where V2 = V x V
These formulas will be used quite a bit in the following discussion
Question. What's the difference between a dc electric motor and a generator? Answer. Almost none. In a motor you apply a current to rotate the shaft. In a generator you turn the shaft to produce an electric current. I'm not going to go into all the theory here, but try to imagine this :- If you apply a voltage to the terminals of a dc motor, current starts to flow in the coils (dependent on the applied voltage and the resistance of the coils) (Ohm's Law). The current produces a turning force on the shaft (torque) proportional to the current (theory not supplied), and if the torque is high enough, the motor begins to rotate. Now here's the bit that's a little harder to understand . When the shaft rotates, the motor also becomes a generator producing its own internal voltage. This voltage is of the same polarity of the applied voltage and has the effect of reducing the applied voltage, which in turn reduces the torque. The internal voltage is termed Back EMF. So, if you have a fixed load on a motor (torque), then the speed of the motor is proportional to the voltage applied because :- To produce a particular torque, the motor requires a certain amount of current. (torque is proportional to current) To produce this current you need a voltage applied to the coils equal to the current in the coils multiplied by the resistance in the coils (which is fixed for a particular motor) (Ohm's Law). Voltage applied to the coils is equal to the voltage applied to the motor minus the Back EMF. The Back EMF is proportional to the RPM of the shaft. Therefore, torque is proportional to current, and at constant torque, RPM is proportional to the applied voltage. If you didn't understand the reasoning, just remember the statement in bold above. It's all that is required for the rest of the discussion.
How do you make your system work better? From the motor theory above, it can be seen that supplying more voltage at the same current, or more current at the same voltage will produce more motor performance, directly proportional to the voltage gain at the same current. So, to improve performance, we could just add another cell to the battery, but that's not always allowed. We could just use higher voltage batteries, but that's not always the answer (see battery discussion later). A lot can be achieved by reducing all the little voltage drops that occur all the way from the battery to the motor, which means reducing all the resistances in the system to achieve the highest possible voltage at the highest possible current.
For some of the how much can I gain calculations later, you really need to know how much current you are drawing off the battery. This is extremely hard to measure while the car is racing, and impossible to get any usable readings while the car is off the track. The following method gives a fairly accurate estimate.
Take the capacity of the battery (milliamp hours), and divide by 1000 to give Amp hours. This figure means that this battery could supply this many amps for 1 hour before going flat. Divide 60 (minutes) by the number of minutes taken to flatten the battery. Multiply this figure by the Amp hour figure for the battery to give average current drain in Amps. Remember this figure for later.
How to test the rest of the system for voltage drops
How to test the internal resistance of your battery packs.
Battery packs have resistances too. If a battery had no internal resistance the voltage of the battery would not get lower when you draw current from it.
This method gives a very accurate measurement of the internal resistance, and is a good way to determine the performance or age of a cell or battery pack.
What does this all mean for you??
If your batteries tested in the 0.07 Ohms or greater area, then you can forget about competing with anyone that has purchased new batteries. If you take the battery resistance and multiply by the average current draw that you worked out before, then you have the average battery voltage drop. High load points (hard acceleration) can be twice this amount. Consider. Your battery pack has a plateau voltage of 7.2 V unloaded, and an internal resistance of 0.07 Ohms, and your average current draw is 20 Amps (typical for stock motors). The voltage drop is 0.07 x 20 = 1.4V. your available voltage at average current draw is 7.2 - 1.4 = 5.8 V. The guy racing next to you has just bought a pack of the new GP batteries GP370SCHR cells. The listed plateau voltage of about 1.26 V per cell and 0.004 Ohms (worst case) per cell, giving a pack voltage of 7.56 V and resistance of 0.024 Ohms. Voltage drop at 20 Amps is 0.48 V giving an output voltage of 7.08 V, 22% more voltage than you at the same current draw which means 22% more speed at the same motor torque. Along with that his battery pack remains in the higher voltage ranges longer because it has much more capacity and will be no where near flat at the end of the race. Another interesting point. Only a few years back, the best battery you could buy was a Sanyo Cadnica NiCd N1700SCR. All good battery packs used this cell. Its plateau voltage is around 1.25 V per cell unloaded and its internal resistance was 0.004 Ohms, where as a GP NiMH GP330SCH cell (common recent cell) has a plateau voltage of 1.28V, but an internal resistance of 0.006 Ohms. At around 17 Amps the N1700SCR delivers more voltage than the GP330SCH, and for all currents higher than this the performance gets better. However, the GP330SCH wins out because it has nearly twice the capacity. This means you can draw nearly twice the current for the same length of time. So you gear the car higher, lose some efficiency, make everything hotter, but you're still there at the end of the race having drawn more power from the battery.
First, I would like to convey that variable frequency speed controls are a good sales gimmick. The manufacturers of VF (variable frequency) speed controls claim the you get more acceleration and higher top speed. All speed controls have no frequency when they're at full throttle. They are just a turned on switch, no frequency, no PWM (pulse width modulation), just simply on. So for top speed or maximum acceleration all speed controls have the same frequency, i.e. none. There is, however, an efficiency gain at variable throttle for higher frequencies, which comes about due to the internal construction of the motor. Basically, the lower the frequency the hotter the motor gets, but for any car motor, anything above 2 kHz (2 kilohertz) causes negligible heating and minimal efficiency loss. With the capacity of current batteries, efficiency in model cars has become a non issue. It has become almost impossible to drain a battery during a race. The resistance of a speed control can be a significant factor. If you purchase a speed control of the type normally supplied with basic model kits, then you will find that drawing in excess of 20 to 25 Amps causes the speed control to get hot. Heat means resistance, and resistance means poor performance. Most of these speed controls have large heatsinks to reduce the problem. Speed controls of the basic type typically have resistances of 8 to 20 mOhms, especially if they are forward/reverse controllers, and some even higher. 8 mOhms at 20 amps is a 0.16V loss and for a 20 mOhm controller is 0.4V loss. At 40 Amps the loss is 0.32V and 0.8V respectively. Stock type (26 turn) motors can reach this sort of current under heavy acceleration, and "mod" motors generally run in this area on average. Most top of the line controllers have a resistance of around 1 mOhm, my own Power Master and Skymaster speed controls have ~0.7 mOhm. To estimate the improvement you could achieve from changing your speed control perform this calculation :- Take the total resistance of your speed control that you worked out before, subtract the resistance of a new speed control (both in Ohms), and multiply this figure by the average current figure from your tests. The answer will be the amount of voltage you could gain by changing your speed control. Example Your current speed control has a resistance of 8 mOhms and your average current draw is 20 Amps. You change to a Power Master Mk VI. (0.008 - 0.0007) x 20 = 0.146V Assuming the available voltage at 20 Amps is 6V, this represents a 2.4% increase in performance. This might not seem like much, but 2.4% could mean a pass down the straight.
Example 2 You have a speed control that is a couple of years old. You test it to have a resistance of 1.2 mOhms. You are running a mod motor and know your average current draw is 50 Amps. You see a new speed control that is rated at 0.6 mOhms on resistance and want to know how much you'll gain. (0.0012 - 0.0006) x 50 = 0.03 V This represents a gain of approximately 0.5%. Hardly worth the upgrade???
If you are running a forward/reverse controller, then consider this. Besides the fact that you are not allowed to use reverse in competition racing, F/R controllers have mosfets switching on the positive wire as well as the negative wire, which equates to twice the internal resistance for a controller that's nearly twice the size. In your speed control resistance test you will have seen that the voltage drop positive in to positive out was nearly identical to negative in to negative out. If you have a forward Brake controller, and it has power in as well as 2 motor wires, then eliminating the speed control internal connection can improve performance marginally. Simply connect the battery positive wire directly to the motor positive, and then connect the speed control positive wire to either the motor positive or from a point in the battery/motor positive wire. The speed control motor positive wire can then be discarded. Warning. Do not do this on a forward reverse controller. When you apply reverse the speed control will short circuit the battery and be destroyed.
All wires have a resistance which is proportional to their length. If you are still running the original wires that came with your speed control, battery or car, then you would probably have calculated a resistance of around 14 mOhms per meter of wire. A normal system could have in excess of 0.7m of wire, which gives a resistance of 9.8 mOhms, which is about 0.2V loss at 20 Amps. So shorten that wire as much as practical. Take particular note as to which end of the battery pack the wires are soldered to. Some packs have the wires running the entire length of the pack and exiting the opposite end. A much better solution is to try a high current wire such as Dean's Wet Noodle. My tests on this wire show it to have a resistance of 5.2 mOhms/m, less than half of standard wires, which is why I use it exclusively on all my high current speed controls. The total "in circuit" wire length can also be shortened by the employing 3 wire forward/brake speed control method described in Speed Controls above, the positive wire to the speed control having no effect on the motor circuit resistance.
All connectors are a source of resistance, so it is essential that the contact surfaces be kept clean, and you use a low resistance plug. My tests have shown that the standard plug that comes with cars and battery packs has a resistance of around 1.76 to 1.9 mOhms new per leg, and with use and damage can be many times this. I have seen these plugs get so hot that they have melted together and cant be separated. Tests on an old used Dean's type plug gave resistance readings of 0.25 mOhms on one leg and 0.42 mOhms on the other, the plug obviously needing a clean. Even so, the resistance was so much better than standard. Another plug which I have a strong dislike for are the gold plated bullet connectors that push into tubes soldered directly to the battery. The resistance of these plugs is extremely low, although I don't have any exact figures, but there is no way to prevent them being connected in reverse. I do a few repairs on other makes of controllers besides my own, and these plugs are the number one reason speed controllers need repairing. Number two is using too small a speed control for the application. If you are going to use these plugs try to perfect some system where the wires can't be reversed. Motor plugs. Use a good type if you need to use them, otherwise solder your wires directly to the motor, and forget the original supplied bullet connectors. Some enthusiasts are so committed to reducing resistance, that they eliminate all plugs, preferring to solder the wires directly to the battery just before the race. They solder to a copper tab which has been permanently soldered to each end of the battery pack. The possible gain in performance over a Dean's plug is less than 0.3% at 40 Amps current draw.
The amount you can gain is dependent on :-
Disregarding battery and motor and looking specifically at everything else. If you had an 'out of the box' system, the total resistance from battery to motor would be in the order of 27 mOhms which would give a voltage drop of 0.54V at 20 Amps and 1.08V at 40 Amps. An upgraded system with top of the line speed control such as Power Master Mk VI, Dean's wire, Dean's battery plug and short wire connections would have an "in circuit" resistance of 2.55 mOhms and a voltage drop of 0.05V at 20 Amps and 0.1V at 40 Amps. That's about 8% gain at 20 Amps and 20% gain at 40 Amps.
I hope this web page has been of assistance to you in helping you improve your system. The calculations and dialogue on this page are correct to the best of my knowledge, and I take no responsibility for problems arising from using the results 'as is'. You would be best to verify the calculations for yourself. If you find any errors, or you have any other results, please email me. Try my performance calculator Car Performance.xls top | |||||||||||||||||
|
This website last updated Monday, 06 November 2006 |